This article may contain personal views and opinion from the author.
Apple Watch Series 5 (left), Galaxy Watch Active 2 (right)
The only thing missing was an upgraded Android tablet, although that might simply be because US carriers don’t expect
5G-enabled slates to generate a lot of consumer interest in the near future. Wait a minute, what about smartwatches? Admit it, you didn’t give the fast-growing device category much thought leading up to the Galaxy S20 and Z Flip launch event, and that’s not just because there was
so little movement on the rumor front these last few months.
The main problem is Samsung still doesn’t think it can take on Apple
at the top of this thriving market. Not really, and until the world’s largest smartphone vendor will start to believe there’s a path to number one for it in the global smartwatch landscape, consumers are unlikely to take the
Galaxy Watch roster seriously.
Was it too early for a Galaxy Watch Active 3?
It’s virtually impossible to answer that question because it sometimes feels like Samsung isn’t thinking ahead very much when it comes to its smartwatch release schedule and especially branding “strategy.” It’s almost like there’s no such strategy at all, and the company decides to wing it once or twice a year, throwing a bunch of confusing names and design revisions against a wall to see if anything sticks.
The Galaxy Watch Active 2 came out less than six months ago
Curiously enough, the relatively affordable
Galaxy Watch Active seemed to stick, earning solid reviews despite ditching the rotating bezel that so many hardcore Samsung fans claimed to love unconditionally. A
second-gen Galaxy Watch Active then came out surprisingly quickly, addressing an entirely different target audience with an increased focus on style and a richer list of features.
That made us wonder whether Samsung would settle on a release schedule with two new models a year, but that doesn’t appear to be the case, which begs another obvious question. Is the Galaxy Watch Active 3 next in line at all, and if so, should we expect a sportier flavor with a lower price point a la the original Watch Active or a more
feature-packed rival to the Apple Watch in the vein of the Watch Active 2?
It’s not too late for a Galaxy Watch 2
No, releasing a Galaxy Watch 2 when many people are expecting a Galaxy Watch Active 3 doesn’t make a lot of sense. But neither did the Galaxy Watch Active on the heels of the original
Galaxy Watch a year ago, let alone the
Gear Sport anomaly from back in 2017.
2018’s gorgeous Galaxy Watch hasn’t technically received a direct sequel yet
What I’m trying to say is, if Samsung isn’t done experimenting with various different designs and UI navigation methods, zigzagging between device names, target audiences, and price brackets, the company may as well go back to roll out a proper sequel to 2018’s Galaxy Watch.
I’m not saying that was a perfect smartwatch (far from it, actually), but while the Galaxy Watch Active 2 looks okay, the Galaxy Watch was hands down the prettiest
Apple Watch alternative ever manufactured by a major tech company (so, no, I’m not including luxury
Montblanc or
Louis Vuitton models in this comparison).
The Galaxy Watch undeniably had the powerful internals to match its premium looks, so even though the price felt a little prohibitive for some people, that’s the direction Samsung should be headed in right now. Otherwise, we might have to wait several more years before
someone can provide real high-end competition for Apple.
Don’t bring a(nother) knife to a gunfight
While it feels pretty much impossible to beat Apple at its own smartwatch game, limiting the appeal of a new wearable device by removing and skipping key features to hit a reasonable price point will only make it more difficult for Samsung to become a real contender in the long run. The budget-friendly Galaxy Watch Active may have boosted the company’s sales numbers, helping it surpass Fitbit, but now it’s time to go after the top dog and making compromises will not cut it.
The Galaxy Watch Active 2 is not powerful, usable, or stylish enough to trump the Apple Watch Series 5
The smartwatch market has become mature enough to support more than one brand focused on providing the best user experience and greatest features regardless of the retail costs, and that second company can be Samsung.
If you think about it, prolonging the development of the Galaxy Watch 2 (or Watch Active 3) may have actually been the right call, giving Samsung more time to improve on its solid previous efforts in meaningful ways so we can finally be at peace recommending a truly great Apple Watch alternative compatible with both iPhones and Android handsets.
Unfortunately, if recent rumors prove accurate, we might not get the Galaxy Watch 2 of our dreams alongside the
Galaxy Note 20 either. While Samsung is
reportedly preparing a decent memory upgrade, the
battery capacity speculation is outright disheartening. Of course, everything else remains under wraps, but this is not an encouraging start, suggesting the company could be planning a modest iterative update of the Galaxy Watch Active 2 rather than an unapologetic, no-holds-barred Galaxy Watch follow-up capable of going head to head against the
Apple Watch Series 6 in terms of raw power, software support, and overall user experience.
Come on, Samsung, you’re better than that, and the state-of-the-art
Galaxy S20 Ultra proves it. In fact, here’s an idea – why not lose the digits and the confusing Sport or Active monikers entirely to roll out a Galaxy Watch Ultra this August? Don’t you think that would send shivers down Tim Cook’s spine?
